DB

Daniel Burko

3 seasons · 3 teams · 2 divisions Compare 2025

Observed in more than one division. D2 2023 at 23 involvements in 16 nineties (1.49/90), then D1 2024-2025 at 0.79/90. Surname is unique in the population, so the match is high confidence. These two rates are not directly comparable, which is exactly what the level model is being built to resolve.

After college

Now at Westchester SC, USL League One. That move is not in his Transfermarkt transfer history yet, which is usual for a recent signing, so this page has the club without the paperwork behind it.

Club during college: Little Rock. Counted as part of the college career, not as turning professional.

Matched to Transfermarkt through Hofstra, Syracuse in his transfer history. This is a name and college match against a public record, not an official one.

Career

SeasonDivTeamPos GP90sGA raw/90adj/90sched rankpct
Career D1 + D2 3 teams 51 38.3 34 7 0.765 0.767

The career row totals only what can be totalled. Schedule, rank and percentile are blank because each one is a position inside a single division-season, so there is no career version of them, and the best season's percentile is not one. The career raw/90 and adj/90 are every season put on the D1 scale and weighted by minutes, which is the only way to total a rate across divisions. The level ladder is measured from 665 players observed in two divisions, in both directions, so it is a within-player comparison rather than a guess. A goal in D2 counts as 0.72 of a D1 goal. Treat it as a translation, not a projection. The ladder is an average over players who moved, and most of them were mid-table, so applying it to someone far out in his division's tail assumes the gap is the same size up there. The mover sample cannot check that.

adjusted per 90
0.832
raw 0.848
rank in D1 2025
38
-2 vs raw · 99th pct
schedule faced
0.98
mean opponent +0.03
production vs weak half
53%
expected 62% · 52% of minutes

2025 · every game by opponent strength

0123weaker halfstronger halfBinghamton rating -0.67 90min 0g 0aPrinceton rating +0.97 76min 0g 0aVermont rating +0.87 90min 0g 0aMonmouth rating -0.18 90min 0g 0aColumbia rating +0.09 72min 0g 0aLoyola Maryland rating -0.53 82min 0g 0aBucknell rating +0.25 90min 1g 0aSt. John's (NY) rating +0.28 90min 1g 0aNortheastern rating -0.26 76min 1g 0aStony Brook rating +0.19 56min 1g 0aDrexel rating -0.18 90min 0g 1aNortheastern rating -0.26 90min 0g 1aStony Brook rating +0.19 90min 2g 0aFordham rating +0.12 78min 2g 0aDrexel rating -0.18 87min 2g 0aMonmouth rating -0.18 84min 1g 2aweaker opponentstronger opponent

Each circle is one game, placed by how strong the opponent was and how many goal involvements he had. Filled circles are games he scored or assisted in. He drew 53% of his involvements against the weaker half where 62% was expected given the schedule he played (p = 0.827). That is within the normal range.

2025 game log

DateOpponentopp rating minGA
2025-08-21 Bucknell H +0.25 90 1 0
2025-08-24 St. John's (NY) H +0.28 90 1 0
2025-08-31 Binghamton A -0.67 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-09-06 Northeastern A -0.26 weaker half 76 1 0
2025-09-09 Princeton A +0.97 76 0 0
2025-09-13 Stony Brook H +0.19 56 1 0
2025-09-16 Vermont A +0.87 90 0 0
2025-09-20 Monmouth H -0.18 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-09-23 Columbia H +0.09 72 0 0
2025-09-27 Drexel A -0.18 weaker half 90 0 1
2025-10-04 Northeastern H -0.26 weaker half 90 0 1
2025-10-07 Loyola Maryland H -0.53 weaker half 82 0 0
2025-10-11 Stony Brook A +0.19 90 2 0
2025-10-21 Fordham A +0.12 78 2 0
2025-10-25 Monmouth A -0.18 weaker half 84 1 2
2025-11-01 Drexel H -0.18 weaker half 87 2 0