Career
| Season | Div | Team | Pos | GP | 90s | G | A | raw/90 | adj/90 | sched | rank | pct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | D1 |  William & Mary |
GK | 9 | 8.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | 0.004 | · | · | not ranked | |
| 2024 | D1 | William & Mary |
GK | 13 | 12.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.001 | · | · | not ranked | |
| Career | D1 | 1 team | 22 | 20.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
The career row totals only what can be totalled. Schedule, rank and percentile are blank because each one is a position inside a single division-season, so there is no career version of them, and the best season's percentile is not one. The career raw/90 and adj/90 are every season put on the D1 scale and weighted by minutes, which is the only way to total a rate across divisions. The level ladder is measured from 665 players observed in two divisions, in both directions, so it is a within-player comparison rather than a guess. Treat it as a translation, not a projection. The ladder is an average over players who moved, and most of them were mid-table, so applying it to someone far out in his division's tail assumes the gap is the same size up there. The mover sample cannot check that.
2025 · every game by opponent strength
Each circle is one game, placed by how strong the opponent was and how many goal involvements he had. Filled circles are games he scored or assisted in.
2025 game log
| Date | Opponent | opp rating | min | G | A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-01 | Rutgers H | +0.13 | 90 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025-09-06 | UMBC H | +0.02 | 90 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025-09-20 | Elon H | +0.11 | 90 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025-09-23 | Old Dominion H | +0.00 | 53 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025-09-27 | Col. of Charleston A | -0.16 | weaker half | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025-09-30 | American H | +0.18 | 90 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025-10-04 | UNCW H | -0.11 | weaker half | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025-10-11 | Campbell H | +0.12 | 90 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025-10-14 | Penn A | +0.54 | 90 | 0 | 0 |