Ethan Doud

Observed in more than one division. D2 2022 at 4 involvements in 18 nineties (0.22/90), then D1 2023-2025 at 0.00/90. These two rates are not directly comparable, which is exactly what the level model is being built to resolve.

Career

Season	Div	Team	Pos	GP	90s	G	A	raw/90	adj/90	sched	rank	pct
2025	D1	Gonzaga	DEF	11	9.8	0	0	0.057	0.056	·	2435	7
2023	D1	CSU Bakersfield	MID	12	11.0	0	0	0.114	0.114	·	2098	21
2022	D2	Fort Hays St.	MID	19	17.9	1	3	0.242	0.222	0.89	1284	49
Career	D1 + D2	3 teams		42	38.7	1	3	0.128	0.120

The career row totals only what can be totalled. Schedule, rank and percentile are blank because each one is a position inside a single division-season, so there is no career version of them, and the best season's percentile is not one. The career raw/90 and adj/90 are every season put on the D1 scale and weighted by minutes, which is the only way to total a rate across divisions. The level ladder is measured from 665 players observed in two divisions, in both directions, so it is a within-player comparison rather than a guess. A goal in D2 counts as 0.72 of a D1 goal. Treat it as a translation, not a projection. The ladder is an average over players who moved, and most of them were mid-table, so applying it to someone far out in his division's tail assumes the gap is the same size up there. The mover sample cannot check that.

2025 · every game by opponent strength

Each circle is one game, placed by how strong the opponent was and how many goal involvements he had. Filled circles are games he scored or assisted in.

2025 game log