BR

Bruno Rivera

2 seasons · 2 teams · 2 divisions Compare 2025

Observed in more than one division. D2 2022 at 2 involvements in 9 nineties (0.23/90), then D1 2023-2025 at 0.10/90. These two rates are not directly comparable, which is exactly what the level model is being built to resolve.

Career

SeasonDivTeamPos GP90sGA raw/90adj/90sched rankpct
Career D1 + D2 2 teams 32 22.4 1 2 0.143 0.133

The career row totals only what can be totalled. Schedule, rank and percentile are blank because each one is a position inside a single division-season, so there is no career version of them, and the best season's percentile is not one. The career raw/90 and adj/90 are every season put on the D1 scale and weighted by minutes, which is the only way to total a rate across divisions. The level ladder is measured from 665 players observed in two divisions, in both directions, so it is a within-player comparison rather than a guess. A goal in D2 counts as 0.72 of a D1 goal. Treat it as a translation, not a projection. The ladder is an average over players who moved, and most of them were mid-table, so applying it to someone far out in his division's tail assumes the gap is the same size up there. The mover sample cannot check that.

adjusted per 90
0.137
raw 0.148
rank in D1 2025
1879
-82 vs raw · 28th pct
schedule faced
0.81
mean opponent -0.29
production vs weak half
100%
expected 90% · 85% of minutes

2025 · every game by opponent strength

012weaker halfstronger halfVillanova rating -0.11 90min 0g 0aMonmouth rating -0.18 90min 0g 0aLoyola Maryland rating -0.53 54min 0g 0aBinghamton rating -0.67 90min 0g 0aJames Madison rating -0.38 84min 0g 0aCanisius rating -0.63 90min 0g 0aSaint Peter's rating -0.47 90min 0g 0aFairfield rating +0.35 90min 0g 0aNiagara rating -0.14 90min 0g 0aSiena rating +0.16 6min 0g 0aRider rating -0.52 45min 0g 0aMerrimack rating -0.25 90min 0g 0aSacred Heart rating +0.42 90min 0g 0aMount St. Mary's rating -0.54 90min 0g 0aManhattan rating -0.41 35min 0g 0aStonehill rating -0.78 90min 0g 1aweaker opponentstronger opponent

Each circle is one game, placed by how strong the opponent was and how many goal involvements he had. Filled circles are games he scored or assisted in. He drew 100% of his involvements against the weaker half where 90% was expected given the schedule he played (p = 0.902). That is within the normal range.

2025 game log

DateOpponentopp rating minGA
2025-08-28 Villanova A -0.11 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-09-02 Monmouth H -0.18 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-09-06 Loyola Maryland H -0.53 weaker half 54 0 0
2025-09-10 Stonehill H -0.78 weaker half 90 0 1
2025-09-13 Binghamton A -0.67 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-09-23 James Madison A -0.38 weaker half 84 0 0
2025-09-27 Canisius A -0.63 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-10-01 Saint Peter's H -0.47 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-10-04 Fairfield A +0.35 90 0 0
2025-10-11 Niagara H -0.14 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-10-15 Siena H +0.16 6 0 0
2025-10-18 Rider A -0.52 weaker half 45 0 0
2025-10-25 Merrimack H -0.25 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-10-29 Sacred Heart A +0.42 90 0 0
2025-11-01 Mount St. Mary's H -0.54 weaker half 90 0 0
2025-11-05 Manhattan A -0.41 weaker half 35 0 0